Stem cell storage- would you pay for this?? I am tempted to do this?
I am just wondering if any other expectant mums out there have heard of this....the blood taken from your babies umbilical cord before being thrown away, I have looked on the cells4life website and it sounds really interesting and a brilliant idea as the blood they collect and store for your baby, the cells can be used to replace damaged or abnormal blood cells as part of the treatment of some malignant blood disorders, such as leukaemia, as an alternative to bone marrow transplantation. The potential benefits of stem cell transplantation are that the cells are immediately available. Also help regenerate skin through burns and things like multiple sclerosis, stroke and alzheimers. It is expensive to do as the premium package costs £1500 and they store the cells for 25 yrs, thereafter you pay a yearly fee. Or £995 for a years storage and collection and after the year it is £50 per year. What do you think about this? Serious answers only plz
My wife and I are expecting (due in a couple of weeks now) and we seriously looked into this.
I think that it is a really good idea. There are so many potential benefits, and the only real "risk" is the initial cost. And - like someone else pointed out - raising a child is expensive anyway, so what's an extra £1500? Think of it as "extra health insurance" costing £60/year.
In fact, we had determined we were going to go ahead with it, but then we encountered a problem:
The hopsital we are using refused to let us.
The Royal College of Midwives will not permit it, because they do not see any proven benefit. And they will not allow an external phlebotomist (who can be provided by the cells4life company) to perform the proceedure in their hospital, on insurance grounds.
We actually read up on the NHS policy, and it really annoyed me. Because they say all of the above reasons. And *then* they say that they *will* allow it under the sole circumstances of a couple who have conceived a second child to try and obtain stem cells for a terminally ill older child!
I mean - doesn't this mean that they *do* in fact think that the Umbilical Stem Cells will work in cell-therapies, at least some of the time? So why not allow a "just in case" if people want to pay for it?
I think that the policy on this needs seriously looked into.
Firstly, a lot of the claims they make are of 'potential' benefits which to me says that they haven't proved that it will actually work.
Secondly, the price. I know people will say that if it does prove to be some miracle treatment, then how can you put a price on that, but I have to say that there is no way I would ever be able to afford it, so there is no point thinking about it in that way. Why skint myself and deprive my baby of luxuries to preserve something that may or may not be useful in the future.
I know I will probably get shot down for this, but its my opinion and I'm entitled to it.
Dont we pay our taxes and National Insurance contributions?
Children cost us a lot anyway so what's an extra grand or so! ( hey at birthday time you can just say.." no presents for the next 10 years...you got your stem cells , remember?" lol
all the best








Eureka! Science NewsWashington, DC: Cells from frozen human blood samples have the potential to be reprogrammed to an embryonic-stem-cell-like state, revealed Whitehead Reprogrammed human blood cells show promise for disease researchall 193 news articles »
TopNews Singapore (press release)Another bureaucrat from the ministry said the temperature and longevity of storage of stem cells are quite different from those of blood, making new rules Doctors Can Sue Over Stem Cell FundingIndian Govt to regulate Stem cell banking to protect consumer interestsStem cell reports part of Michigan budget debateall 74 news articles »